Commentary on Watanabe and Takeda

Authors

  • Urtė Cinelytė Amp sound branding

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v18i1.9718

Keywords:

piano performance, performance practice, piano repertoire

Abstract

This is a commentary on Watanabe and Takeda's article, "Why do I like Schumann more than Chopin? A Physiological Analysis of Pianists' Affinities for Composers". The study offers a valuable insight into the relation between pianists' physiological 'Stance Type', as evaluated through 6 short test exercises, and their preference as well as aptitude for music by certain composers. While being a valuable presentation of a potentially very practical and effective method that addresses development and improvement of piano performance skills, there is some scope for improvement, namely: insight into how the three hypotheses were derived, detailed explanation of the proposed body positions for the performance of tempo-driven and momentum-driven composers' music, reasoning for effectiveness of the two body positions, and reconsideration of some terminology.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-12

How to Cite

Cinelytė, U. (2024). Commentary on Watanabe and Takeda. Empirical Musicology Review, 18(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v18i1.9718

Issue

Section

Commentaries